🔗 Share this article

An unexpected connection on LinkedIn. An offer of employment from a headhunter, probably a female agent, operating from China. The opportunity to make around £20,000 on the side preparing a small number of political analyses for a firm from China peppered with “non-public” or “insider” information. Payment in digital currency or physical money favored.

It may seem clear, in this scenario, that something about this method would be suspicious. Nevertheless, China’s influential Ministry of State Security still considers it valuable to deploy recruitment consultants to try it – prompting MI5 to issue multiple warnings about their activity online.

Large-Scale Contact Attempts on Social Media

In 2023, the head of MI5 Ken McCallum stated Chinese agents were approaching Britons on LinkedIn on an unprecedented level, at a frequency of ten thousand over the preceding two and a half years, seeking political, commercial, defense and scientific secrets. However a new initiative aimed at politicians and parliament has led the intelligence service to take further action.

An espionage warning was distributed on Tuesday via the offices of Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords equivalent: a single slide after the repeated efforts of Shirly Shen and Amanda Qiu to contact MPs, peers, their staffers, economists, thinktanks – anybody who might become a source.

Security Approach and Legislative Updates

In the typical style of British intelligence, there was no publication of the security advice from the agency or the Home Office. But the service was aware its advisory document would become public once it was emailed out to parliament. Sharing it in the press helps the general population more easily recognize communications with a fraudulent purpose.

This warning has the impact of uncovering more information from in and around Westminster, although that is not MI5’s primary purpose. The agency aims for people in public life to recognize that simply because interactions on professional networks are less overtly risky as on other social platforms, it does not mean they are completely safe.

Nor is internal security service believed to have been responding to any specific incident in parliament, although the burst of activity occur after the awkward collapse of the prosecution of a ex-assistant an individual and his associate Christopher Berry on a legal detail earlier in the autumn.

Both individuals had been charged of working for China – a charge they denied – but failure to successfully conclude a trial under the since replaced Official Secrets Act resulted in concerns that British democracy had been insufficiently defended.

Updated Legislation and China's Strategic Goals

The law has now been changed, and the security briefing contains a reminder of its replacement: “Individuals involved in spying operations risk significant criminal penalties under the National Security Act.” It is a crime if somebody engages in behavior that is or is likely to “significantly help a foreign intelligence service”.

A natural question, though, is what China has to gain. A politician who is outside ministerial roles will have limited knowledge of sensitive information, and an associate of theirs even less. But the Chinese government is also interested in parliament: for a period, in 2020 and 2021, the UK’s approach to China on matters such as Huawei or the Uyghur repression or alleged atrocities was being driven by MPs.

Methodological Variations and Persistent Digital Threats

To a degree there are distinct approaches as well. Autocratic regimes like Beijing's export intelligence collection techniques and the scale of its spy network is enormous, engaging 300,000 individuals. A former US official, a US national cyber director under president Joe Biden, commented it was occasionally assessed that “the Chinese have more English speakers engaged in this than we [western intelligence] have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is willing to develop contacts over the long term and at times even the intelligence services have found it difficult to distinguish between legitimate relationships and spying. “Beijing has a low threshold for what information is considered to be useful,” the minister responsible Dan Jarvis informed parliamentarians on Wednesday, but a rapid shift in the political cycle may mean an individual quickly marginal becomes significant.

An alternative perspective to consider the relentless efforts at secret intelligence collection is in the broader framework of the geopolitical contest between Beijing and the west at a level below the level of direct conflict. China has increased its hacking efforts, with the one campaign penetration of communications systems in 80 countries, and the another operation breach of millions connected equipment.

Beijing is involved in relentless efforts to find secret informants on UK politics online because it seeks to be provocative, to demonstrate power and because it can.